Andefena was founded to close the gap between how risk is assessed and how capital decisions are actually made. The climate risk industry built sophisticated capability pointed at coordinates. We needed it pointed at the buildings, the portfolios, and the funds where capital is actually deployed.
The methodology was developed through direct work with institutional real estate owners, fund managers, lenders, and insurers: the people who receive the PDFs and proceed without them. Every piece of the architecture exists because a real decision required it.
Today, Andefena operates across the world, working with institutional clients who need climate, carbon, and nature risk to be decision-ready: before the investment committee, not after.
Simon spent three decades inside the institutional real estate decisions that Andefena now serves: portfolio strategy, sustainability, and operational scale at the intersection where climate, carbon, and nature risk either enters financial decisions or gets filed away.
The methodology that became Andefena was not designed in theory. It was built to answer questions that existing tools could not: starting with the buildings and portfolios themselves, not the climate projections pointed at their coordinates.
Measure, capacity, and nature. Measure is the starting point: quantifying where a building, a portfolio, or a fund stands across climate, carbon, and nature risk. Capacity is the diagnosis: how much room exists before a constraint binds, and whether that room can be created. Nature is the context that makes measure and capacity meaningful: the nature of the asset, the nature of the hazard, and the nature of the relationship between the owner and whoever is making a decision about it.
Built from inside the decisions. Now available to yours.
Request an engagement