The climate risk industry was built to report. The carbon industry to measure. The nature industry to describe. None were built to inform the decisions capital has to make.
The problem
Why now
ASRS requires Australian listed entities to report climate-related financial risks from 2025. SS5/25 requires UK-regulated firms to assess at property level. TNFD and ISSB S2 are converging globally. Climate, carbon, and nature risk is no longer optional disclosure - it is becoming a condition of capital access.
The solution
Two scales of the same assessment.
At the asset
At the entity
Physical margin to failure threshold. Not a score. The distance to the point where something breaks.
Which domain limits the asset's runway - the building itself, its function, its dependencies, or the market.
Can the position improve, at what cost, and in what timeframe.
Not a report
When extreme weather hits an assessed asset, the system prompts: how did it cope? If it performed as modelled, confidence increases. If it didn't, headroom estimates sharpen.
Every engagement adds data to the pattern library. What typically binds, what interventions cost, what works. The methodology gets smarter with every assessment.
When climate projections update or carbon pathways tighten, headroom recalculates automatically. The pathway is an input. The decision is the output.
Why Andefena
Who we work with
Asset and portfolio strategy
Fund strategy and LP reporting
Collateral climate risk assessment
Underwriting and peril validation
Fund climate position and alpha signals
Due diligence and operational risk
The infrastructure to do this doesn't exist. That's why we started.
Book a briefing